Blog Published

Blog_15635622594527_S

15635622594527


En una reunión de pastoral y vida parroquial, un grupo de laicos se quejaba ante el párroco porque la celebración dominical de la eucaristía, “era demasiado larga, insípida, monótona y aburrida”. El párroco, que era quien siempre la presidía, muy molesto, les contestó: “Pues, prepárense, que el cielo es una Misa que no se acaba nunca!”.

Una justificación no exenta de ambigüedad ya que, si bien la Misa no es un espectáculo para entretener a los creyentes, la forma de celebrar los sagrados misterios de Cristo debe ser el lenguaje con que la Iglesia vibra y hace vibrar la experiencia vital de la comunidad. Un lenguaje articulado en la más profunda convicción cristiana, que saca de la historia y de la teología los signos para celebrar y vivir la fe que ha recibido del mismo Cristo, de la tradición fundante de los apóstoles y del enriquecimiento que la reflexión a lo largo de siglos ha ido aportando a las formas litúrgicas.  

Todo lo que es objeto de la fe tiene su lugar en la oración de la Iglesia. Celebramos aquello que creemos y toda celebración es una reafirmación en la comprensión de las verdades a las que somos llamados a adherirnos desde adentro. La liturgia no solo celebra la fe dentro de un modelo de Iglesia, sino que lo manifiesta. No sólo celebra los acontecimientos (el recuerdo del pasado), sino también todas las afirmaciones que brotan de las experiencias importantes que ha vivido y vive actualmente. La ley y las formas de oración, celebración y culto, no son únicamente la ley de la fe sino también la ley del ser y el hacer de la comunidad creyente; porque hay una relación directa entre la manera de entender el presente en que se vive y, desde esa experiencia compartida, asumir una determinada imagen de Dios, de Cristo, de la Iglesia y también de la liturgia y de la acción pastoral.

El antiguo lenguaje de la liturgia ha adquirido expresiones mas actuales a partir de la gran renovación del Concilio Vaticano II. San Juan XXIII advertía a los padres conciliares que la mejor forma de conservar el tesoro de la tradición y la fe no era “guardarla en un museo”, sino devolviéndole la vitalidad propia y la necesaria comprensión de los signos y ritos por parte del pueblo de Dios, válido y verdadero celebrante de la liturgia.

En los primeros siglos de la Iglesia se accedía al bautismo a través de una auténtica conversión consolidada por el proceso del catecumenado, que demoraba el tiempo que fuera necesario; una vez que el candidato, después de la cuaresma y en la noche de la vigilia pascual, era plenamente iniciado a través de los sacramentos del Bautismo, la Confirmación y la Eucaristía, el obispo los convocaba durante las siete semanas de pascua para iniciarlos en la comprensión de los contenidos y el lenguaje sagrado de la liturgia.

Estas catequesis llamadas “Mistagógicas” completaban la instrucción recibida durante el catecumenado y permitían a los neófitos entender el significado de los ritos, signos y símbolos que podía encontrar en las celebraciones comunitarias. La catequesis mistagógica era imprescindible para que el creyente accediera al entendimiento del lenguaje litúrgico y pudiera entender y disfrutar a plenitud de los sagrados misterios de Cristo.

Con el paso de los siglos y el devenir de la Iglesia, estas catequesis fueron abandonadas y la celebración de la asamblea creyente se convirtió en un rito misterioso al que había que asistir en silencio, sin participación exterior, separado por la barrera del latín, exento de visibilidad, con el altar ahogado por inmensos retablos, en el que la más importante liturgia, la de la Eucaristía, aparecía como asunto exclusivo del sacerdote o del obispo y que nos obligaba a “oír Misa los domingos y fiestas de guardar”, con una actitud pasiva y al menos, aunque tardíamente, siguiendo lo que pasaba ante nosotros con la ayuda de un misal bilingüe.  

La renovación litúrgica nos hizo saltar desde la extrema pasividad a la que estábamos reducidos en la liturgia pre-conciliar, a la extrema exteriorización en una participación plena, activa y consciente de todos los ritos del culto católico, pero con la deficiencia de la ausencia de una catequesis simbólica que ayudara en comprensión de la rica tradición celebrante de la Iglesia. Nos queda el reto de asumir el entendimiento del sentido de los ritos, de los ritmos del año litúrgico, del valor de las fiestas, de la apropiación de los gestos que se realizan y las palabras que se pronuncian, de asimilar los textos que se proclaman, se recitan y se cantan y en definitiva de dejarse penetrar por las imágenes que se observan y los perfumes que se huelen. Se nos invita a celebrar bien para dar la mejor imagen de una Iglesia que, alimentada en el espíritu, manifiesta su verdad en la calidad de los signos.

San Juan Pablo II nos recordaba que “la asamblea alitúrgica es el signo que da hospitalidad a Cristo y a los que él ama”. Hay que cuidar de la calidad de la liturgia, de los signos, las personas y el lugar de la celebración de la fe, para que estos hablen por sí mismos, catequicen, manifiesten, y guíen a Cristo. De esta manera la asamblea de los fieles se transforma en el gran signo de la Palabra de Dios, escuchada y asumida, expresada en la oración, el canto, la música, las personas, los colores, las vestiduras, y el silencio; se trata de manifestar la conexión entre lo humano y lo divino para transparentar la presencia de Cristo en el hermoso centro de la liturgia.

Tal como pedía el papa Pablo VI al comienzo de la aplicación de la reforma litúrgica: “dediquen sumo cuidado al conocimiento y la aplicación de las normas con las que la Iglesia quiere celebrar el culto divino”. Y también reconocía en su alocución que esto “No es cosa fácil, es cosa delicada, requiere interés directo y metódico, requiere asistencia personal, paciente, amorosa, verdaderamente pastoral”.

Y en eso estamos...

Comments from readers

Josue Luis Hernandez - 08/02/2019 10:27 AM
Is Susan from the Parish Council the one moderating the comments here? None of my posts are going up...
Gustavo - 07/31/2019 11:28 AM
Let’s see what Pope St Pius V said about changing the liturgy: In Quo primum . in In the bull Pope Pius V declared: "By this present Constitution, which will be valid henceforth, now, and forever, We order and enjoin that nothing must be added to Our recently published Missal, nothing omitted from it, nor anything whatsoever be changed within it." And he concluded: "No one whosoever is permitted to alter this notice of Our permission, statute, ordinance, command, precept, grant, indult, declaration, will, decree, and prohibition. Should anyone dare to contravene it, let him know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul." Many in the episcopate including the Novus Ordo Popes will have much explaining to do when they meet our Blessed Lord on judgement day.
Andrew Meszaros - 07/31/2019 09:21 AM
In order to express more clearly the unity and universality of the Church, I wish to endorse the proposal made by the Synod of Bishops, in harmony with the directives of the Second Vatican Council, that, with the exception of the readings, the homily and the prayer of the faithful, it is fitting that such liturgies be celebrated in Latin. Similarly, the better-known prayers of the Church's tradition should be recited in Latin and, if possible, selections of Gregorian chant should be sung. Speaking more generally, I ask that future priests, from their time in the seminary, receive the preparation needed to understand and to celebrate Mass in Latin, and also to use Latin texts and execute Gregorian chant; nor should we forget that the faithful can be taught to recite the more common prayers in Latin, and also to sing parts of the liturgy to Gregorian chant. (Sacramentum Caritatis No. 62, Benedict XVI)
Christopher John Blanco, DPM - 07/31/2019 09:13 AM
The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is exactly what it implies, The Holy Sacrifice. There is only One Holy Sacrifice and that is the redemptive sacrifice of Our Lord and redeemer on Calvary, which is exactly what we are witnessing every time we attend mass. We are transported, literally to Calvary, 2000 years ago, standing silent, with Mary, St. John and the other Marys at the foot of the cross. It has nothing to do with the people or the priest it is all about the incruent immolation of our Lord at the sacrificial alter of Calvary and therefore the priest or Alter Christus must face the Cross of Our Lord, after all, did Mary,John, etc, turn their backs to the cross to face those who caused him to willingly hang on it for them? No! They stood silently, Stabat Mater, praying for all of us joining their prayers, in silence to the Holy sacrifice. The Holy sacrifice is not about the faithful but rather for the faithful who should remain in silent prayer before the greatest event ever to take place in human history, facing the cross along with the priest who is, by his majestic office is representing us, in the Holy of Holies, offering the most perfect sacrifice for himself and the faithful. A priest who turns his back to the cross, the alter of sacrifice, is showing a high disrespect to our Lord and will be held accountable. He should know better. As far as Latin, go to a Latin mass for 6 months, pay attention and you will begin to understand it. It's a dead language and therefore meanings and syntax doesn't change with it and therefore brings universality or catholicity to the Mystical Body of Our Lord. I highly recommend the book "Iota Unum,a study of the changes in the Catholic Church in the XX century" by the prominent theologian, Romano Amerio (1905-1997). He was involved in the planning of the original schema of the council which was completely disregarded. Iota Unum makes reference to Matthew 5:18,"Iota Unum aut unus apex non praeteribit( not one dot or tittle).
Ana Rodriguez-Soto - 07/31/2019 08:44 AM
I would just like to clarify that Pope Benedict was in no way opposed to the liturgical reforms of Vatican II. Here are some other quotes from him: The Ratzinger Report, pp. 123-124: “Prior to Trent a multiplicity of rites and liturgies had been allowed within the Church. The Fathers of Trent took the liturgy of the city of Rome and prescribed it for the whole Church; they only retained those Western liturgies which had existed for more than two hundred years. This is what happened, for instance, with the Ambrosian rite of the Diocese of Milan. If it would foster devotion in many believers and encourage respect for piety of particular Catholic groups, I would personally support a return to the ancient situation, i.e. to a certain liturgical pluralism.” Feast of Faith, p. 87 “Lest there be any misunderstanding, let me add that as far as its content is concerned (apart from a few criticisms), I am very grateful for the new Missal, for the way it has enriched the treasury of prayers and prefaces, for the new eucharistic prayers and the increased number of texts for use on weekdays, etc., quite apart from the availability of the vernacular. But I do regard it as unfortunate that we have been presented with the idea of a new book rather than with that of continuity within a single liturgical history. In my view, a new edition will need to make it quite clear that the so-called Missal of Paul VI is nothing other than a renewed form of the same Missal to which Pius X, Urban VIII, Pius V and their predecessors have contributed, right from the Church’s earliest history.” For those who would like to read more on the liturgy, may I suggest Benedict's Sacramentum Caritatis: https://bit.ly/2YgiALb
Patrick J Prendergast Sr - 07/30/2019 04:51 PM
Dear Mr. Zelada, I am 55 years of age. Learning more and more of the context of our faith based in the Word. My curiosity in Church Militant led to an explosion of concern that I am also trying to put into context. Knowing the results of Vatican II are far from the intent I remain gravely concerned that we must return to the traditional mass sans the Latin language. I believe the common tongue brings all closer to Christ. I believe the prayer to St. Michael must also return to the mass. We are in desperate times with diminishing members of the faith in attendance at mass let alone receiving the sacred sacraments of our Lord. There must be an accounting and we as the faithful must do more in service and daily prayer.
Josue Luis Hernandez - 07/30/2019 03:56 PM
Dear Mr. Zelada, I appreciate your concern for the current state of the liturgy but, with all due respect, contrary to what you've expressed in your article, the liturgical reforms following the Second Vatican Council have resulted in nothing but tragedy for the Church. The experiment in novelty and aggiornamento was a colossal failure. It's about time we humble ourselves and finally admit that the emperor has no clothes. The Novus Ordo Mass is "a fabrication, a banal on-the-spot product", to quote Pope Benedict XVI. Let's face up to the truth and move on already. Sometimes progress means turning back. Respectfully yours in Christ, Josue Luis Hernandez "What happened after the Council was something else entirely: in the place of the liturgy as the fruit of development came fabricated liturgy. We abandoned the organic, living process of growth and development over centuries and replaced it, as in a manufacturing process, with a fabrication, a banal on-the-spot product" -Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger
Jose Ignacio Ignacio Jimenez - 07/30/2019 01:39 AM
I agree with St.John Paul II ("We must take care of the quality of the liturgy..."); his cautionary warning spoke to the liberties taken post Vatican II. I've discovered this "care" in the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM, Extraordinary Form, or Tridentine Mass) offered in some parishes in the Archdiocese. The use of Latin is not barrier, but rather a unifying element, a common language. In the TLM the Liturgy of the Eucharist is not "the exclusive affair of the priest" but rather the congregation faces the altar along with the priest who is also facing the altar and leading us as we witness the sacrifice the priest is offering in persona Christi. The faithful are not offering the Mass, but we are not passive; we are praying and there is nothing passive in that. The TLM provided me with the "symbolic catechesis" which you correctly point out has been lacking. The beauty of the Gregorian chants, the smell of incense, the reverence of the priest, altar servers, and congregation are a welcome respite from the world and a much needed "slap in the face" to remind me that I am at Mass to pray and witness the Re-presentation of the sacrifice of Calgary and Christ's victory over death. I am not there to be entertained. Anyone that wants to appreciate the rich traditions of the Church and gain a better understanding of the Novus Ordo Mass should experience the TLM. There is a hunger for a more devout and deeper understanding of the Mass and I believe this is why so many young people are attending the Traditional Latin Mass and why vocations in more traditional religious orders are growing dramatically. Hope springs eternal.
Andrew Meszaros - 07/29/2019 12:48 PM
For further reading about this I would strongly recommend reading a superb, short reflection on the subject, titled "The Spirit of the Liturgy" by Benedict XVI.
Osvaldo Riveron - 07/29/2019 11:58 AM
Excelente Rogelio, como siempre, necesitamos muchos articulos como este en las parroquias. Que el Señor te siga bendiciendo y te te de mucha salud para que nos siga instruyendo. Osvaldo Riveron

Powered by Parish Mate | E-system

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply