A world awash with weapons

Monday, August 21, 2017

*Tony Magliano - Freelance columnist

English Spanish

If someone’s house was on fire would you pour gasoline on it? Well the answer is obvious: Of course you wouldn’t. Yet that is very similar to what the United States and many other more economically developed nations are doing.

Despite the tragic fact that approximately 40 current armed conflicts worldwide are causing over 150,000 deaths annually, countless serious injuries, untold destruction and 28,300 people per day fleeing from their homes, many of the wealthiest countries continue to pour flammable weapons into these volatile conflicts. And the U.S. is leading the pack (see: http://bit.ly/2ufpP5Y).

Accounting for 33 percent of arms exports to over 55 nations, the U.S. is by far the world’s leading arms merchant, followed by Russia, China, France, Germany, United Kingdom, Spain and Italy.

And worse yet, according to the Congressional Research Service, poorer nations continue to be the primary focus for weapons suppliers. The value of all arms agreements in 2014 with economically developing nations was over $61 billion. And as always, the poor suffer.

The U.S. ranked first in worldwide weapons sales in 2015 with $40 billion in deals signed. Of the six largest weapons manufacturers in the world, five are American, with Lockheed Martin ranking first.

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, the 100 most profitable weapon producing companies in the world raked in over $400 billion in arms sales in 2013.

Weapons are big business – a bloody business followers of the Prince of Peace should have nothing to do with. Moral courage is needed here. The Gospel demands it!

Imagine the good that would be accomplished and the goodwill that would be established if we converted our weapon plants into factories that construct goods that protect and enhance life – especially the lives of the poor, vulnerable and the life of our common home planet Earth.

Instead of producing instruments designed to kill like M-16s rifles, F-35 Lightning II fighter jets, M1 Abrams tanks, and abortion vacuum aspiration machines – which are instruments of war against unborn babies – we could massively produce humane products like low-cost house building kits, water pumps, water filtering kits, modern latrines, farm tools, wind turbines, solar panels, mass transit trains, affordable electric cars and mobile hospitals.

For those who think this is naïve, consider that the reverse happened during World War II. According to historian John Buescher, no American cars, commercial trucks, or auto parts were made from February 1942 to October 1945. “The auto industry retooled to manufacture tanks, trucks, jeeps, airplanes, bombs, torpedoes, steel helmets, and ammunition under massive contracts issued by the government” (see: http://teachinghistory.org/history-content/ask-a-historian/24088).

Please email and call your members of Congress (Capitol switchboard: 202-224-3121) urging them to significantly reduce funding for the weapons industry and creatively funnel that money into needed peaceful enterprises. And urge them to seriously undertake initiatives aimed at multilateral disarmament.

Since history has proven that we can quickly retool industry from building peaceful vehicles of transportation and commerce to constructing instruments for war-making, let’s do the right thing and turn all of this around.

Let’s make history, good history! History that future generations will thank us for.

In the words of the prophet Isaiah, let us finally beat our swords into plowshares and our spears into pruning hooks; so that nations will no longer raise the sword against one another, nor train for war again.

Comments from readers

Betty Bezos - 08/25/2017 12:58 PM

Thanks for the article. With all due respect, your words would have made sense in the world before the onset of armed terrorists. The idea of disarmament in front of a terrorist that does not relate to a country or makes it possible to establish government to government multilateral negotiations is a bit naive. Our efforts as Catholics should be to advocate for peace in all countries currently experiencing political turmoil. By disavowing hate and encouraging a vision of stability, the dark forces do not find suitable souls to embrace destruction, disrespect or overt control of citizens will. Sadly, we do not have to look too far nowadays - our cities are trembling under the feet of a few willing to destroy our society while covering their faces.

Paul Schlachter - 08/24/2017 09:42 AM

Tony is absolutely right. The peace of which he writes is very close to and helps to make possible the peace for which we pray at every mass. The Son of God to whom we pray rejected arms in his own defense.

Betty Bezos - 08/25/2017 12:58 PM: Thanks for the article. With all due respect, your words would have made sense in the world before the onset of armed terrorists. The idea of disarmament in front of a terrorist that does not relate to a country or makes it possible to establish government to government multilateral negotiations is a bit naive. Our efforts as Catholics should be to advocate for peace in all countries currently experiencing political turmoil. By disavowing hate and encouraging a vision of stability, the dark forces do not find suitable souls to embrace destruction, disrespect or overt control of citizens will. Sadly, we do not have to look too far nowadays - our cities are trembling under the feet of a few willing to destroy our society while covering their faces.

Paul Schlachter - 08/24/2017 09:42 AM: Tony is absolutely right. The peace of which he writes is very close to and helps to make possible the peace for which we pray at every mass. The Son of God to whom we pray rejected arms in his own defense.